IJTIMOIY MASOFANING TIL BIRLIKLARI VA NUTQIY STRATEGIYALAR ORQALI IFODALANISHINING LINGVOPRAGMATIK HAMDA LINGVOMADANIY XUSUSIYATLARI
Keywords:
ijtimoiy masofa, lingvopragmatika, lingvomadaniyat, nutqiy strategiya, kommunikativ xulq, hurmat kategoriyasi, diskurs.Abstract
Ushbu maqolada ijtimoiy masofaning lingvopragmatik va lingvomadaniy xususiyatlari ilmiy-nazariy jihatdan tahlil qilinib, uning til birliklari hamda nutqiy strategiyalar orqali ifodalanish mexanizmlari asoslab beriladi. Tadqiqotda ijtimoiy masofa kommunikativ jarayonning muhim parametri sifatida talqin etilib, uning leksik, morfologik, sintaktik va paralingvistik vositalar orqali namoyon bo‘lish xususiyatlari yoritiladi. Shuningdek, rasmiylik, yaqinlashuv, yuzni saqlash va diskursiv moslashuv strategiyalari doirasida ijtimoiy masofaning boshqarilish mexanizmlari ochib beriladi. Tadqiqot natijalari ijtimoiy masofani adekvat anglash kommunikativ samaradorlikni ta’minlashda muhim omil ekanligini asoslaydi.
References
1. Brown P., Levinson S. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987. – 345 p.
2. Spencer-Oatey H. Culturally Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness Theory. – London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2020. – 320 p.
3. Culpeper J. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019. – 292 p.
4. Locher M.A. Interpersonal Pragmatics and its Link to (Im)Politeness Research. – Journal of Pragmatics, 2021. – Vol. 173. – P. 5–14.
5. Kádár D.Z. Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022. – 300 p.
6. Terkourafi M. Politeness and Formulaicity: Evidence from Cypriot Greek. – Journal of Pragmatics, 2020. – Vol. 155. – P. 1–12.
7. Pütz M., Neff-van Aertselaer J. Developing Contrastive Pragmatics: Interlanguage and Cross-Cultural Perspectives. – Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2021. – 410 p.
8. Karasik V.I. Yazykovoy krug: lichnost, kontsepty, diskurs. – Volgograd: Peremena, 2002. – 477 s.
