URF-ODAT VA AN’ANALAR ORQALI IJTIMOIY KAPITAL VORISIYLIGINI TA’MINLASH
Keywords:
Ijtimoiy kapital, urf-odatlar, an’analar, vorisiylik, avlodlar o‘rtasi o‘tkazish, madaniy meros, jamiyat ustuvorligi, globallashuv, o‘zbek jamiyati.Abstract
Ushbu maqola urf-odat va an’analar orqali ijtimoiy kapitalning avlodlar o‘rtasida vorisiyligini (o‘tkazilishini) ta’minlash masalasini o‘rganadi. Ijtimoiy kapital jamiyatdagi munosabatlar, ishonch va normalar tizimi sifatida ta’riflanadi, u madaniy meros orqali saqlanadi va o‘tkaziladi. Maqolada ilmiy adabiyot tahlili, mexanizmlar muhokamasi, amaliy misollar va zamonoviy xavflar ko‘rib chiqiladi. Tadqiqot natijalari shuni ko‘rsatadiki, urf-odatlar ijtimoiy kapitalni mustahkamlaydi, lekin globallashuv va urbanizatsiya kabi omillar ularni zaiflashtirishi mumkin. Asosiy takliflar jamiyatlarning madaniy ustuvorliklarini hisobga olib, siyosat va tadqiqotlarni rivojlantirishdan iborat. Maqola o‘zbek jamiyati misolida global kontekstni tahlil qiladi.
References
1. Ahmadaliev, A. (2015). O‘zbek urf-odatlari va ijtimoiy munosabatlar. Toshkent: O‘zbekiston universiteti nashriyoti.
2. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The Forms of Capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241-258). Greenwood.
3. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120.
4. Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New York: Free Press.
5. Granovetter, M. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
6. Karimov, I. (2010). Mahalla: Traditional Institution in Uzbekistan. Tashkent: Uzbekistan Press.
7. Portes, A. (1998). Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1-24.
8. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
9. Woolcock, M. (2001). The Place of Social Capital in Understanding Social and Economic