GEOMETRIK OPTIKA MAVZULARINI O’QITISHDA AXBOROT KOMMUNIKATSIYA TEXNOLOGIYALARIDAN FOYDALANISH TATBIQI
Keywords:
geometrik optika, interaktiv simulyatsiyalar, “oPhysics” web-sahifasi, “algodoo” dasturiAbstract
AKT yordamida o'qituvchilar geometrik optika mavzularini interaktiv tarzda taqdim etishlari mumkin. Misol uchun, interaktiv simulyatorlar, virtual laboratoriyalar va 3D grafikalar yordamida o'quvchilar turli optik hodisalarni vizual tarzda ko'rishlari mumkin. Bu o'quvchilarga optika qonunlari va prinsiplari qanday ishlashini yaxshiroq tushunishga yordam beradi. Geometrik optika mavzularini o’qitishda ko’plab interaktiv simulyatsiyalardan foydalanishimiz mumkin.Shunday interaktiv simulyatsiyalar saytlaridan biri “oPhysics”web-sahifasi “algodoo” dasturidir. oPhysics - fizika fanini o‘rganish uchun onlayn platforma bo‘lib, interaktiv simulyatsiyalar va amaliy mashqlar yordamida o‘quvchilarga fizikaviy tushunchalarni o‘rganishga yordam beradi. Algodoo interaktiv va vizual fizika simulyatsiya dasturi bo'lib, foydalanuvchilarga turli fizik jarayonlarni, jumladan optika, mexanika, dinamikani va boshqa sohalarni simulyatsiya qilish imkoniyatini beradi.
References
1. S. Papert, Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas (Basic Books, New York, 1980).
2. K. Bodin, C. Lacoursière, and M. Servin, “Constraint fluids,” IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 18, 516–526 (2012).
3. C. Lacoursière, “Ghosts and Machines: Regularized Variational Methods for Interactive Simulations of Multibodies with Dry Frictional Contacts,” PhD dissertation, Umea University, 2007; http://umu.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A140361&dswid=6646, accessed Jan. 22, 2016.
4. C. E. Wieman, W. K. Adams, and K. K. Perkins, “PhET: Simulations that enhance learning,” Sci. 322, 682–683 (2008).
5. B. Gregorcic, “Exploring Kepler’s laws using an interactive whiteboard and Algodoo," Phys. Educ. 50, 511–515 (2015).
6. B. Gregorcic, E. Etkina, and G. Planinšič, “Designing and investigating new ways of interactive whiteboard use in physics instruction,” in PERC 2014 Proc. (2014).
7. M. Bodin, “Mapping university students’ epistemic framing of computational physics using network analysis,” Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 010115 (2012).
8. Kirsch, V. L. (2018). Geometric Optics: Principles and Applications. Physics Review Journal.
9. Lopez, S. (2020). Interactive Simulations in Physics Education. International Journal of Science Education, 42(5), 733-744.
10. Anderson, P. (2017). The Role of Virtual Laboratories in Teaching Optics. Journal of Educational Technology, 19(3), 456-470.
11. Ahmedov S., Djumayeva G. SURFACE ENHANCED RAMAN SCATTERING: NEW CONCEPTS IN MECHANISMS AND MODELING //Western European Journal of Modern Experiments and Scientific Methods. – 2024. – Т. 2. – №. 4. – С. 127-134.
12. Shodmanov J. B. O. G. L. et al. AROMATIK UGLEVODORODLARDA YORUG’LIKNING NOQUTBLANGAN MOLEKULYAR SOCHILISHI //Academic research in educational sciences. – 2022. – Т. 3. – №. 3. – С. 1127-1137.
13. Tillaxujayeva S., Ahmedov S. USE OF RAMAN SPECTROSCOPY IN ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND MEDICAL ANALYSES //EduVision: Journal of Innovations in Pedagogy and Educational Advancements. – 2025. – Т. 1. – №. 3. – С. 352-357.
14. W. Christian, M. Belloni, F. Esquembre, B. A. Mason, L. Barbato, and M. Riggsbee, “The Physlet approach to simulation design,” Phys. Teach. 53, 419–422 (Oct. 2015).
15. J. Koreš, “Using Phun to study ‘perpetual motion’ machines,” Phys. Teach. 50, 278–279 (May 2012).
16. Algoryx, “Algodoo – Science Education for a New Generation,” YouTube, https://youtu.be/xvAVQ6GEv-E, accessed Jan. 22, 2016.
